|
Beers Skanskas U.S. Federal Courthouse in Jacksonville
Takes the Top Prize in
This Years Program
By
Scott Judy
Southeast Construction-Florida Edition
is pleased to present its 2002 Best of Florida Awards program.
As the title indicates, this program is the magazines
effort to provide a look at the best projects
completed during 2002.
This is the second time for this annual event.
As we did for our inaugural effort in 2001, Southeast Construction-Florida
Edition first solicited entries from contractors and other
firms for the Florida projects they thought merited consideration
for a Best Of award.
This year, 22 construction entities submitted
a total of 41 project entries, spanning 10 separate categories.
After the entry deadline, an independent group
of judges was selected. The selection of judges took place
at this time to ensure that no judges had entries for the
competition, and could therefore provide an unbiased opinion
of the submissions. Representing various segments of Floridas
construction industry, the group gathered on Sept. 24 at Southeast
Constructions offices to review the submissions.
The group of judges included the following members:
-
Alan Ashlock, president of Crane Rental
of Orlando, Orlando;
-
Jim Barrett, project manager with the
Orange County Convention Center Phase V Expansion project
in Orlando.
-
Dana Emberton, senior vice president of
Suitt Construction Co., Maitland;
-
Richard Girdley, vice president and project
manager with Hill/MK, a joint venture managing projects
for Tampa Bay Water in Tampa;
-
Bruce Kershner, executive director of
the Underground Utility Contractors of Florida; the Florida
Directional Drilling Association; and the Mid Florida
Utilities & Transportation Contractors, all based
in Longwood; and,
-
John Page, business development manager
for Perini Building Co., Celebration.
The panel was directed to rate the project
entries on the following criteria:
-
Quality of construction or design;
-
Innovation;
-
Contribution to the industry;
-
Ability to overcome unique construction
or design challenges; and,
-
Overall excellence.
As long as there was a minimum of three entries
in a category, the highest scoring entry in a category would
win the Best Of award for that group. Based on
that criteria, nine projects qualified for these major awards.
Failing to be the top-rated entry for a category
would not necessarily prevent a project from winning an award.
If it gained a high enough score, it could win either an Award
of Excellence, or, below that, an Award of Merit.
This year, there was one Award of Excellence winner,
and six projects that were recognized with an Award
of Merit.
This year, top category awards were given for
the following: Private Buildings; Public Buildings; Hospitality/Commercial;
Residential; Educational; Renovation/Restoration; Infrastructure;
Concrete; and Mechanical/Electrical. In addition, an Award
of Excellence was presented for the Hospitality/Commercial
category, and Awards of Merit were presented for: Residential;
Renovation/Restoration; Architectural Design and Infrastructure.
In addition to rating each project, the group
of judges also selected the Judges Award
for best overall project. The judges selected Beers Skanskas
entry for its U.S. Courthouse project in Jacksonville as the
best overall.
|