Features
 Current Features
 Past Features





Features - June 2006

Powering Up in Cross, S.C.

Santee Cooper is Building Two Additional Units at Cross Generating Station

By Carter Langston

Current population projections estimate that a million more people will move to South Carolina over the next 20 years, and one electric utility is investing in needed infrastructure improvements to meet ever-increasing power demands.
And it's doing it in the Lowcountry, where the water table is shallow and hurricanes and earthquakes are possible.

South Carolina Public Service Authority/Santee Cooper Power of Moncks Corner, S.C., is building two coal-fired generating stations in Cross, S.C., at a total cost of $1.4 billion.

"At the moment, we have more contract workers onsite than Santee Cooper employees," said Laura Varn, vice president of corporate communication and media relations for Santee Cooper Power. The utility operates fossil-fueled, nuclear and hydroelectric generators and produces energy for all 46 counties of South Carolina.

Varn estimated that the utility serves 48 percent of the people in the state. It directly powers about 150,000 homes and businesses and also generates power for 20 electric cooperatives in the state, which means the utility ultimately powers roughly 800,000 to 900,000 households.

The company employs 1,740 people. And there are 1,800 contract workers onsite building the Cross Generating Station 3 and Cross Generating Station 4. Both new generating units are located along a linear configuration with two older generating units on a 3,000-acre site between lakes Marion and Moultrie in Berkeley County.

Currently, the Cross Generating Station produces 1,160 megawatts of electricity per hour. The additional capacity that units 3 and 4 will produce when they are commissioned will bring this station's total output to 2,360 megawatts per hour.

While Santee Cooper is the general contractor, the projects employ 20 different contractors on a multiprime concept, including WorleyParsons of Reading, Pa., as the engineer and managing contractor, said Jack Holden, Santee Cooper's manager of station construction. There are about 50 subcontractors also onsite, he said.

"We coordinate all the collateral work internally and manage about 140 specific contracts," Holden added.

advertisement

Project Details

Both of the new units, like their two older counterparts at the Cross Generating Station, are pulverized coal-fired plants and are designed to meet Title I air quality compliance requirements. Unit 4, though it adds the same 600 megawatts of generating capacity as Unit 3, represents the greater cost of the expansion. Unit 4 is estimated to cost about $755 million and is scheduled to begin producing electricity in January 2009.

Construction on Unit 3 will cost about $675 million and is scheduled for completion in January. Holder attributes the $80 million additional cost for Unit 4 to the time costs associated with increased equipment and labor costs.

Construction started on Unit 3 on Feb. 23, 2004. Unit 4 was approved for construction on Feb. 24, 2004, and has been generally built in tandem with its linear counterpart.

Varn said construction is on budget, but there have been some challenges.

New generating facilities must meet strict air quality standards. The water table is about 4 ft. below surface here, hurricanes tend to visit with some frequency and the Cross Generating Station sits atop a fault line that nearly leveled Charleston in 1886.

To meet the exacting requirements of Title I air quality standards, Santee Cooper is installing state-of-the-art scrubber units and pollution control equipment to reduce nitrogen oxide and sulfur dioxide. Company officials said other generating stations throughout the state will be retrofitted with similar equipment. and by 2009, Santee Cooper anticipates the controls will reduce the pounds per unit of electricity generated for NOX by 70 percent and reduce SO2 by 50 percent.

Because the Cross Generating Station's four generating units sit within the possible strike zone of hurricanes and earthquakes, current building codes require heavy steel and prestressed concrete piles that are driven to the limestone layer. The foundations of the 20 new structures for units 3 and 4, which spread across roughly 12 acres on the Cross Generating Station's 3,000-acre site, comprise 20,000 prestressed concrete piles.

The 20 buildings include two turbine buildings, which are constructed lengthwise and tie in to the existing turbine building, connecting each of the four generating units along a .25-mi. stretch. There also are two coal silos and bay areas; two boiler buildings; two selective catalytic reduction structures; two electrostatic precipitators; two flue gas desulphurization buildings; one chimney with two flues that serves both units 3 and 4; reagent preparation structure; limestone handling structure; two fly ash silos; gypsum processing building; and two cooling towers.

Each structure is built to sustain extreme conditions.

"According to the building codes, units 3 and 4 are constructed to withstand up to 120 mph sustained winds and can endure seismic movement," Holden said. "You can physically see the difference between the new units and the older two units (built according to different code requirements)."

In the chimney, for example, there are about 660 tons of reinforcing steel and about 5,000 cu. yds. of concrete in the 464-ft. structure. The chimney that supports units 1 and 2 stands about 625 ft. and was built according to earlier building codes, Holder said.

He said the biggest difference in the building codes is the foundation construction. The first two units, built in 1983 and 1995, are built on a socketed caisson foundation system drilled into the limestone layer and filled with concrete. Current codes require the prestressed concrete pilings.

Click here for past Features >>





 


Network Sponsors

© 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
All Rights Reserved